What is really worth thinking about right now is not the issue of genetic modification itself, but the public’s recognition of genetically modified products and their evasiveness. It has reached an extreme point.
On February 21st, on the eve of the two sessions, the Legal Affairs Office of the State Council issued a “Draft for Solicitation of Food Laws†drafted by the National Development and Reform Commission and the State Grain Administration, together with relevant departments. Article 12 of the meeting specifically stated: “Scientific research and testing of genetically modified grain seeds. Production, sales, import and export shall comply with relevant state regulations. No unit or individual may use genetically modified technology on major grain varieties.â€
This is seen as another major milestone in the development of GM in China. A few days ago, Yuan Longping, a domestic agricultural expert, commented on the genetically modified product that, although he was a middleman for genetic modification, he still believed that, without the experimental results as a basis, the use of genetically modified plants for staple food production is "prudential." . According to the information provided by the College of Biosafety of Genetically Modified Agricultural Products of Iowa State University, the United States eats 22 kilograms of soybean oil, 7 kilograms of soy protein and other soy products per person per year. The GM soybeans accounted for 93% of the soybeans in the food market, because most foods do not have the label for identifying transgenes, so most of the soybean products consumed by consumers are certainly genetically modified.
Of course, it does not mean that the standards of the United States must be scientific and safe. It is only a reference. When dealing with new things, there can be one more perspective.
But what is really worth thinking about at present is not the problem of genetic modification itself, but the public’s perception of genetically modified products and their evasiveness. It has reached an extreme point. “The big raisins are also thought to be genetically modified. The little cherry tomatoes are also thought to be genetically modified. Navel oranges have a small orange and they think they are genetically modified. The purple purple sweet potato is also thought to be genetically modified. Transgenics are really Chinese. It can't do anything," said the agricultural professional who fluttered on Weibo. In fact, this is indeed the case. “Soil degradation and heavy metal pollution are the biggest problems in China's agriculture. However, when saliva is spilled on genetically modified plants, it is too wasteful.â€
As a consumer, I also refuse to use unproven GM products. However, if problems do not occur, such as a decrease in fertility rate, it will be a matter of eating GM foods. This hat, buckled too much, and the inevitable link between the two come from? This comparison experiment is also very difficult to complete. The environment, food, and stress of survival cannot be used alone as a cause of fertility reduction.
Wu Danying.
Xps Extruded Polystyrene,Flame Retardant Extruded Board,Exterior Wall Extruded Board,Basement Exterior Wall Extruded Board
Zhengzhou Ou Nuo Building Materials Co., Ltd. , https://www.yuounuo.com